Social Policy

Social policy attracts more good intentions and less evidence than any other part of government. Programmes are funded because they sound compassionate, continued because stopping them looks cruel, and evaluated seldom if at all.

The Initiative's approach rests on two commitments. The first is that claims should be tested. A good deal of what New Zealanders believe about poverty, inequality and welfare does not survive contact with the data, and policy built on a false diagnosis will not work however generously it is funded. The second is that people receiving help are usually the best judges of what they need. Services designed around providers tend to serve providers. Personal budgets and devolved delivery hand control back to the person whose life is at stake, and welfare should be measured by how many people it moves into work and independence.

The same instinct governs how the state regulates private conduct. Taxes and restrictions aimed at alcohol, food, tobacco or gambling should be judged on whether they actually reduce harm, and weighed against the freedom of the large majority harming nobody.

A liberal society treats adults as adults and checks whether its kindness is working.

NZ by comparison cover with outline

Featured Publication

Publications

Opinion & Media

Stay in the loop: Subscribe to updates